Edit: and I am not just saying that because Kansas City doesn’t make the list, although that helps.
Texas division looking STACKED.
Wait… Why no Atlanta?
It would be interesting to do this statistical metro areas instead of cities as well, as a comparison.
It’d also be interesting to do it proportional, so cities like NY, LA and Chicago would have multiple teams before smaller metro areas got their first one.
Minneapolis/St Paul metro is the 16th largest metropolitan statistical area in the country, even though minneapolis and saint paul are both relatively small cities.
Your Louisville placement is a little too far east.
Do it.
– guy from pdx
Louisville is on the Western side of the state.
Should’ve went with the Oklahoma City Super Sonics lol
Miami isn’t a top 30 city in the U.S? I would have guessed Miami, due to the weather etc would have been top 10.
Surprised New Orleans isn’t in the top 30 either.
Let’s go my favorite team the Los Angeles rams 💪💪
The El Paso saints lmao
Metro area, not city size. Nitpicking as the Vikings went to Memphis, even though the metro area is 1/3rd of Minneapolis / St Paul
Happy the Bengals wouldn’t need to leave their state
Only thing I’d change is put the Chargers back in San Diego
God damn El Paso stole my freaking NFL Team
I like how the Chargers changed their name to the Rams
I don’t like any world where the Green Bay Packers don’t exist
As others have said, city population is really not a useful metric in this regard and metro would be much better.
Fort Worth Bills is so cursed
Apportion the teams to cities based on the cost of living. Put two teams in Honolulu.
As a chiefs fan in Austin I would be ok with this universe
Eat this Atlanta Metropolitan Area Falcons!
Louisville is that big?
So many people are shocked to hear about Jax being the largest US city landwise but I’m sitting over here like “El Paso is a large city?!?!”
TIL Miami has less than 500,000 people
Everything on the coasts has a team. The large swaths of the county in the middle of nowhere are trying to entice the XFL to come play for them
I’m confused, how does Miami not make it?
Largest cities are so misleading.
Whenever discussing how “large” a city is, it’s always better to use the Metropolitan Statisticsal Area or even the Combined Statistical Area metric over than just the city. You have large cities like Minneapolis, St. Louis, Miami, and Atlanta being left out because they have so many large suburbs that really tie the whole city together.
How did you treat Kansas City and Minneapolis/St. Paul?
If you count by Metro those are both top 30. If you count them as just the namesake city they are not.
Now someone make the correct version with metro areas
Interesting that even when separating Dallas and ft worth they’re each top 30 still
OP did not check his work before posting
You should use the population of the metropolitan statistical area (MSA) rather than the city itself. Atlanta is not on this list despite being the 8th largest MSA in the country.
So because Jacksonville city limits back up to every yard in the southeast they are technically the largest city in Florida, but with a population barely under a million, and a metro pop of 1.6 million. Meanwhile down I-95, Miami’s metropolitan area is 6 million people. This map is dumb.
40 comments
So my big takeaway here is Jacksonville is one of the 30 largest cities in the US
Why not 32?
There’s 32 teams in the league.
You should do it based on Metropolitan Statistical Areas or something similar, city size can be a false sense of size. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metropolitan_statistical_area
Edit: and I am not just saying that because Kansas City doesn’t make the list, although that helps.
Texas division looking STACKED.
Wait… Why no Atlanta?
It would be interesting to do this statistical metro areas instead of cities as well, as a comparison.
It’d also be interesting to do it proportional, so cities like NY, LA and Chicago would have multiple teams before smaller metro areas got their first one.
Minneapolis/St Paul metro is the 16th largest metropolitan statistical area in the country, even though minneapolis and saint paul are both relatively small cities.
Your Louisville placement is a little too far east.
Do it.
– guy from pdx
Louisville is on the Western side of the state.
Should’ve went with the Oklahoma City Super Sonics lol
Miami isn’t a top 30 city in the U.S? I would have guessed Miami, due to the weather etc would have been top 10.
Surprised New Orleans isn’t in the top 30 either.
Let’s go my favorite team the Los Angeles rams 💪💪
The El Paso saints lmao
Metro area, not city size. Nitpicking as the Vikings went to Memphis, even though the metro area is 1/3rd of Minneapolis / St Paul
Happy the Bengals wouldn’t need to leave their state
Only thing I’d change is put the Chargers back in San Diego
God damn El Paso stole my freaking NFL Team
I like how the Chargers changed their name to the Rams
I don’t like any world where the Green Bay Packers don’t exist
As others have said, city population is really not a useful metric in this regard and metro would be much better.
Fort Worth Bills is so cursed
Apportion the teams to cities based on the cost of living. Put two teams in Honolulu.
[US Cities by Cost of Living](https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2024/01/03/what-is-cost-of-living/71838710007/)
As a Lions fan who grew up in Portland, I am not in favor of this.
Louisville is further down the Ohio river not up river
City population is dumb. Miami and Atlanta are top 10 markets.
Wouldn’t [largest metro areas](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metropolitan_statistical_area#Rankings) make most sense?
Portland Packers does sound pretty nice
As a chiefs fan in Austin I would be ok with this universe
Eat this Atlanta Metropolitan Area Falcons!
Louisville is that big?
So many people are shocked to hear about Jax being the largest US city landwise but I’m sitting over here like “El Paso is a large city?!?!”
TIL Miami has less than 500,000 people
Everything on the coasts has a team. The large swaths of the county in the middle of nowhere are trying to entice the XFL to come play for them
I’m confused, how does Miami not make it?
Largest cities are so misleading.
Whenever discussing how “large” a city is, it’s always better to use the Metropolitan Statisticsal Area or even the Combined Statistical Area metric over than just the city. You have large cities like Minneapolis, St. Louis, Miami, and Atlanta being left out because they have so many large suburbs that really tie the whole city together.
How did you treat Kansas City and Minneapolis/St. Paul?
If you count by Metro those are both top 30. If you count them as just the namesake city they are not.
Now someone make the correct version with metro areas
Interesting that even when separating Dallas and ft worth they’re each top 30 still
OP did not check his work before posting
You should use the population of the metropolitan statistical area (MSA) rather than the city itself. Atlanta is not on this list despite being the 8th largest MSA in the country.
So because Jacksonville city limits back up to every yard in the southeast they are technically the largest city in Florida, but with a population barely under a million, and a metro pop of 1.6 million. Meanwhile down I-95, Miami’s metropolitan area is 6 million people. This map is dumb.