Commanders Target? Chiefs Place Non-Exclusive Tag on Snead


If you’re looking for a place to invest some of **Washington’s** ample salary cap space, you could do a lot worse than adding an elite skill player at a premium position.

The guy’s on the right side of 30 & has several seasons of prime level play left in the tank.

Not to mention, he’d be an awesome addition to a **Commanders** secondary that faces AJ Brown and CeeDee Lamb twice each season.

The **Commanders FO** should be looking to add more secondary depth in the draft, for sure, but this guy is an instant upgrade at a position that would have an outsized impact.

Those types of players don’t come along every FA window.

Thoughts?

8 comments
  1. Wouldn’t be mad at it but signing him means no Kendall fuller or no kam curl. I’m willing to let go of Kendall or sneed though

  2. We’re not giving up 2 first round picks for a corner, and that’s what the compensation would be if we signed him

  3. I was willing to give up two firsts for lamar jackson last season, but not for snead lmao

  4. Giving up picks for the right to offer a market setting contract almost never works. It’s spending your draft picks on free agents. Might as well just use your picks or sign the free agent, not do both in one shot.

  5. > If a player on a non-exclusive tag agrees to a deal with a new team, **the original team can match it or refuse and be awarded two first-round picks as compensation**.

    You want to give up 2 first-round picks for the right to sign Sneed to a massive deal? No thanks.

Leave a Reply