Dan Quinn suggests that they’ve received calls from “picks 6 or 7”. Think there’s any truth to this?


Dan Quinn suggests that they’ve received calls from “picks 6 or 7”. Think there’s any truth to this?

10 comments
  1. I rock with it. There’s a generational wideout still there who could handle taking over for Nuk when the time comes.

    I’m all in on a LT (specifically Alt) but if there is somehow someway we can get MHJ you get MHJ. Besides the fact he is awesome, it would be that much sweeter if we were able to have Marv’s son for the next decade dotting them Indianapolis fuck boys up with Billy Jeans.

    I also think there is some fear that someone gets ahead of us for a LT and that’s where this could be coming from.

  2. Draft Alt at 7 or trade back (if you can) if Alt isn’t available. It’s really that simple.

  3. Wait so this is saying we’re moving up? I’m just gonna assume we are a throw in to make it not look obvious that it’s just the Gaints he’s talking about (it’s still obvious).

    Trading serious draft capital to get MHJ would be Ran over cooking, and surely we are not already moving off Big Mayo.

  4. I don’t really read that as though they’ve fielded calls from 6 or 7, just that it’s normally teams picking in top 6 or 7 that would be looking to move up to 2.

  5. Imagine if the whole ploy was to build the team for Jaden Daniels and we move up to 2 and grab him. How insane would it be then we have all 3 qbs Malik gets traded in the midst of it.

  6. I’d bet ran has called. That’s just due diligence and possibly drives the price up for others. But I really don’t see them trading up this year.

  7. Might be a suggestion someone trades up to 7 to get closer. Might be asking the question what it would take from there.

  8. It’s a chess move. That’s all it would be. I think Amy made it clear by name that he would be given a chance to prove himself with a new staff and some better personnel.

Leave a Reply