[Slater] Steve Kerr: “If you want to say (Steph Curry) playing 30 or 32 minutes was the difference in a win or a loss, I totally disagree.”


[Slater] Steve Kerr: “If you want to say (Steph Curry) playing 30 or 32 minutes was the difference in a win or a loss, I totally disagree.”

48 comments
  1. Under 30 minutes for Curry was pretty unacceptable, but to be fair to Kerr, the real issue were just the completely wide open looks the Warriors gave the Wolves at the end of the third and beginning of the fourth quarter. Unless we consider steph to be their defensive anchor now lol

  2. People call us out for saying this dude shouldn’t be the coach b/c we won 4 championships (which I’m forever grateful for). The game simply moved on from Steve Kerr and extending him was the worst possible mistake the FO could make

  3. Playing your best player sub 30 minutes while possibly falling out of the play-in spot is certainly a decision

  4. Oh ok then. So just play Steph 28 min then or even better don’t play him at all, because apparently it doesn’t make a difference

  5. What about 34 or 36 minutes Steve?

    That’s half a quarter? That wouldn’t affect a game?

  6. Lmfaoooo this is objectively hilarious. How does he do this? Most coaches tend to over rely on their stars.

  7. 4-6 extra minutes is actually big in an nba game and could be a major difference.

  8. You would think someone fighting for Playoffs would play his players more minutes but Kerr disagrees. I understand if it was a blowout but come on, it was very winnable.

  9. Steph Curry is the only superstar where his minutes have to be very precise. He’s taken out of the game the same time no matter what. I don’t get why Steve Kerr can’t just leave him in for 40+ minutes

  10. Hopefully GSW fires some if not all assistant coaches who had been one of the worst. Plus GSW need to get under the tax. Need to let go of some of the unplayable and non dependable vets unless they sign on team friendly terms eg Klay. And please don’t look to rejected and unless vets as Kerr love those failed players and play them over younger players game in game out.

  11. I noticed Steph not playing a huge chunk in the early 4th and I was quite pleased

  12. In a game of runs, when the Warriors couldn’t score to save their lifes, it totally was the right move to play Steph 29 minutes but Klay 33, and also give Klay the last shot to tie the game, it totally wasn’t Kerr fault, the other team had their stars play 37/38, minutes, almost a full quarter of basketball extra, and the Warriors were -11 with Steph on the bench, but god forbid Kerr from taking any responsibility for being a dumb rock

  13. Y’all need to stop criticizing Kerr, he knows what he’s doing and y’all obviously don’t.

    He should play Curry even less

  14. Kerr will never ever admit he made the wrong decision. He’s insufferable and it’s shocking how unlikeable he’s gotten in the last 5 years

  15. Steve already has his Cancun reservation in, can’t get a refund on that deposit guys.

  16. Kerr is just upset and being defensive. Of course 2 minutes of Steph matters in a close game everyone knows it

  17. Psh do you really think basketball is a game where the best player often determines who wins???

  18. Uhh, it’s Steph… the guy who made any lead unsafe in modern basketball..

  19. Idk what the specifics of the situation are but two more minutes of your best player in a 4 point loss can absolutely make a difference lol. And we could then move to “is it worth upping a player’s minutes a ton for a regular season win” but they’re in danger of only having a regular season and it’s 32 minutes we’re talking about here, not adding 15 to get to 45

  20. Fuck the minutes, ask him why he ran a play for Klay instead of Curry to tie the game lol

Leave a Reply