Before anyone freaks out about Pete’s mock draft, let’s check on what happened last year.


He got one right. Anything is still possible.

7 comments
  1. Downside is that I think he’s had a few years in a row of getting a lot correct……

  2. he bassically got it right about us tho last year just its very hard to mock a trade down and back up but he got it right that we trade down and take a OT

  3. 4 for 6 and 47 is the only way I feel good about trading with Giants personally. Love MHJ but I cant turn down 4 picks in the top 47

  4. I missed something, why is this relevant? Seems like he got a lot of picks horribly wrong

  5. Looking at last year’s mock draft, Schrager got a lot of players correct in terms of their pick range. Schrager is very connected with front offices, has a lot of contacts there. GMs aren’t telling him who they’re trying to draft obviously, but Schrager does seem to have a very good pulse on how players are viewed across the league. When he has a player in the late first, there’s a damn good chance front offices view that guy as a late-first kind of prospect.

    This mock draft is a pretty good tool in that respect. As always, mock drafts are useless if you hyperfocus on your own team. Especially on this sub, where every non-MHJ mock seems to be a non-starter. But there’s a whole lot else we can glean from this mock.

    What intrigues me, personally, is that Schrager has Amarius Mims at 25. Dane Brugler and others have him in the mid to late teens. Schrager has him in the range of our second pick, which I think would be very cool. Having a raw yet freakishly athletic Mims sit behind Jonah Williams for a year to get pro ready, and become the franchise LT sounds really good in my head.

Leave a Reply