Giants would be inviting chaos if they use a high draft pick on a QB (Schwartz)


Giants would be inviting chaos if they use a high draft pick on a QB (Schwartz)

18 comments
  1. Isn’t Maye and JJ both like 22? Let them sit – if DJ stays healthy and balls out (15 tds) we can flip him for a late round pick and not rush these kids

  2. The thing is, the Gm and coach need to be very clear. If we draft a QB and they do a presser saying that QB will red shirt a full year and play under no circumstances then it won’t be chaos. If they leave it open then ya it will be chaos the second jones or whoever has a bad game

  3. An open and fair QB competition isn’t chaos. And the only “chaos” would be if DJ balls out and looks like he did two years ago when not given the fifth year option while playing for his job.

    Which would be a good thing. That’s a very good problem to have. Not having any QB you can trust would be the opposite and very possible if we don’t grab someone this draft.

    Personally I’m in the “hope for Penix and a WR1 plus some linemen later in the draft and Penix starts on the bench only getting to play if DJ struggles camp

  4. The premise is incorrect. His argument would hold water if Jones was a healthy quarterback, but he is not. And it’s not just minor injuries, it’s serious injuries that are a constant threat to Jones.

    This makes it clear that he is not going to be the starting quarterback of the Giants for much longer. There is no controversy to be had.

  5. People are like crack addicts for this crap. Just stop clicking, it’s all garbage speculation and deep fantasy.

  6. If that is what they think is best for the organization so be it, our players will keep playing hard whoever is qb

  7. I agree, for us to move up we’d have to trade a great player our first this year and maybe our first next year, that’s way toooooo much. As our GM said “we are not a piece away” we are close but if we move up we are delaying us being a good team for literal years. Anyone who wants us to trade up is simply coping

  8. Paul “Judge won’t get fired, Mara thinks he found his Parcells =D” “Abrams would be a great choice for the GM job!” Schwartz

  9. Why not add some chaos if the current product isn’t working?

    The whole article is kind of a nothingburger as the author doesn’t advocates for not drafting a QB, only that the fans should be aware of the ensuing chaos of drafting one. His example is jettisoning Kerry Collins after drafting Eli in 2004. If that is his best argument, then the fans should embrace the chaos, since it brought 15 years of stability afterwards.

  10. in Danny we trust (half of the fan base needs to wake the fuck up and SUPPORT OUR QB)

  11. Paul Schwartz is Pat Hanlon’s mouthpiece. If he saying this they either:

    a) Want a smokescreen
    b) Prepare the fanbase for a non-QB
    c) Both

    My vote is c. They are interested in a QB and don’t want anyone to know and just in case they fail they’ve prepped the fanbase for a wr or whatever.

Leave a Reply