[Talkin Giants] How much stock do you take in the Giants only meeting with one WR outside of the options at pick 6?


[Talkin Giants] How much stock do you take in the Giants only meeting with one WR outside of the options at pick 6?

11 comments
  1. probably thinking that we’re either taking one at 6 or giving up our second to move up for a qb

  2. It makes sense. The Giants don’t need WRs as much as they need a bonafide number one WR. I do think there’s something to how deep this WR class is but you can still draft a guy without having met with them.

    But we already have Slayton, Hyatt, Robinson and Hodgins – what we need is a top guy not more depth.

  3. Because even Hellen Keller can see unless some magical trade up or down arises, we are picking one of MHJ, Odunze or Nabers.

  4. They need to nail the first round pick, so if all of those other WRs are day 2-3 guys, and they focused on other positions that they might take in round 1, then I’m good.

  5. Well in the mid rounds, you’re probably taking a likely undersized guy with WR2-3 projections.

    We have… oh I don’t know… 7 of those guys already on the roster.

Leave a Reply