Canucks player stat card


Canucks player stat card

21 comments
  1. Pettersson being our best forward on this is sure going to make a select group angry

  2. Give Zadorov the Hronkey money.

    Also Petey being 3rd on this chart is going to elicit a very strong response

  3. When graph shows petey good: “these graphs are stupid”
    When graph shows petey bad: “omg bottom left petey”

  4. Hronek doesn’t have very good decision-making skills on the offensive side which is a problem because Hughes can create so much space for him

    Zadorov was great until that bad pinch on the first goal against.

    Wish Pettersson got a better shot off… oh well.

  5. Sometimes when everyone is a black hole of offence it’s actually just a great defensive effort on the other side.

  6. Zadorov playing like prime Pronger out there laying the boom left,right and center. His extension should be a priority.

  7. I thought Petey was pretty good tonight. Not a bad effort by the team overall, but man… This team has another gear that they’re just incapable of reaching right now.

  8. Hronek has been our worst defenseman this series. I would feel completely ok if we do not re-sign him.

  9. The only surprises to me are Lindholm and Cole. Lindholm was doing great on the forecheck, I swear he held the puck in half a dozen times and created chances out of nowhere.

    Cole had one really bad giveaway in the 2nd, surprised his defensive impact was so positive

  10. Defensively Petey was good which checks out, offensively though we got nothing out of him and that’s what we need out of him and i’m sure that’s where a lot of the frustrations of most of the fanbase comes from.

    certainly better than his previous games, but we need more than him to just be a defensive specialist.

  11. Ahhh the omniscient wisdom of statistics done incorrectly.

    (No, I don’t respond to reddit comments, too much AI silliness. But if you’re curious, you could look up how random distribution is a fundamental requirement for valid statistics including most regression models etc. The same formulas tend to work in other sports because unlike hockey, there isn’t really line matching.)

  12. this matches the eye test, petey didn’t even look bad at all this game, imo his best game so far

  13. Hronek is concerning. Refuses to shoot, causing ghastly turnovers and being a non-factor in general. We can’t possibly pay this guy 8M a year right?

  14. Honestly outside of 12 seconds of game 1 and OT in game 4, the Joshua-Lindholm-Garland line isnt really looking all that dangerous.

  15. Best game for Petey by far this series. Seems like the Garland line has been held in check since the first game though (or at least not super dominating like they’ve been most of this season).

  16. Could someone explain what I’m looking at? I’m newer to hockey so I don’t know all the analytics.

Leave a Reply