Hawks better not trade Hunter.

25 comments
  1. Seems like a sell-high moment for a guy who is perpetually injured. The question is the return.

  2. There’s nothing the nuggets could give us that’s worth trading the immediate impact hunter gives us off the bench.

  3. Not going to lie, wouldn’t be mad at a sell high situation. Often injured and has not lived up to expectations. Pair him and OO.

  4. Dre has been great but he’s constantly injured and only time will tell if he can stay healthy so I wouldn’t be mad at a high sell. However if it’s for MPJ hang up the phone.

  5. MPJ is also an injury risk, he plays worse defense and he’s on a more expensive contract. Not really sure why trading Hunter for him helps us long term.

  6. Hunter has been pretty healthy this year and he’s in the perfect situation as the 2nd or 3rd best defender. We def shouldn’t trade him.

  7. I’ll be fine with a Hunter deal if he’s in a package to get a star if we’re buyers at the deadline but otherwise no bc he’s been impactful

  8. Hunter playing well is he our 6th man or is Bogi? I could see the hawks moving one of them for a 4. I could also see the hawks standing pat

  9. I wouldn’t do a Dre for mpj straight up .. but if they attached an unprotected pick … I mean …

  10. Nuggets have nothing to offer, they don’t even have their 1st this year. They just named him probably bc he’s been on the block before

  11. Lowkey I’d like if we could add some serious scoring off the bench like a Jordan Poole or James harden just someone to come in get 20 points leave

  12. What if Trae says that he will extend if they go and get MPJ? This is an entirely possible scenario for a franchise player. 

Leave a Reply