As we approach Super Bowl weekend, the big story is Mahomes might become the first player to win three straight. I want you all to keep in mind that Bart Starr won three consecutive championships from 1965 to 1967.

As we approach Super Bowl weekend, the big story is Mahomes might become the first player to win three straight. I want you all to keep in mind that Bart Starr won three consecutive championships from 1965 to 1967.
byu/akproplayer inGreenBayPackers

25 comments
  1. Since it wasn’t the Super Bowl era, they say you can’t count it. Packers technically have done it twice.

  2. Pre Super Bowl era doesn’t count.

    No one cares about pre Super Bowl championships except packers fans and y’all make us look soft and desperate by counting them

  3. Just look how dangerously close those receivers are to those end zone goalposts. I think that makes our highlights more epic than this pansy current-era goalpost-behind-endzone tomfoolery

  4. Yes. Championships. Not superbowls. It’s not complicated. Why are you guys so obsessed with this? It’s every other post.

  5. How many posts do we need about this?

    Honestly it makes us look incredibly petty. Super Bowl era is different. I don’t want the Chiefs to win but, if they do, nobody is going to care about our “but technically,” arguments.

  6. To those sayig pre-super bowl don’t count, seems weird to not count 1965 but count 1966 & 1967 because they changed the name.

  7. It’s just because the title Lombardi trophy. Stigma of pre merger/trophy name will always be a thing. Similar to people not realizing rodgers avg better post season stats than Brady in most categories. His defenses just gave up 35+ in conference championship games vs 21.5

    you can scream and holler all you want but it’s just how it is

  8. They always specified three straight Super Bowls, and it is true. Mahomes would be the first

  9. A man’s man right there and before he died he went to honor Favre when his number was retired in Lambeau, Bart Starr loved Brett Favre

Leave a Reply