Yes. Let’s make it easier for owners who do not invest in their teams to have an excuse to not invest in their teams
This so-called evening the field is a crutch for poorly owned teams (Pit, Colo, A’s, new Padres owner, Seattle, and SFG)
I put the Giants on the poorly owned list as they own their own stadium, they have a good fanbase, but they refuse to invest in development and scouting
Everyone is salty about the Dodgers because they do those things.
I so wish the Giants had a better ownership structure. A relatively large ownership group is consensus based and risk averse which lead to teams that are around .500, are kind of boring, and usually do not have star-power.
This whole, get into the post season and go on a heater is hope and as well all know hope is not a strategy
3 comments
Don’t give me hope
Yes. Let’s make it easier for owners who do not invest in their teams to have an excuse to not invest in their teams
This so-called evening the field is a crutch for poorly owned teams (Pit, Colo, A’s, new Padres owner, Seattle, and SFG)
I put the Giants on the poorly owned list as they own their own stadium, they have a good fanbase, but they refuse to invest in development and scouting
Everyone is salty about the Dodgers because they do those things.
I so wish the Giants had a better ownership structure. A relatively large ownership group is consensus based and risk averse which lead to teams that are around .500, are kind of boring, and usually do not have star-power.
This whole, get into the post season and go on a heater is hope and as well all know hope is not a strategy
Not without a salary floor.