Nick unveils The Committee’s™️ Greatest Dynasties Tiers 👀 @FirstThingsFirst

16 comments

1. I know it was different QBs but Washington has to be higher

2. Treadwell wide right!

3. Would you not put the Seahawks in there they went back to back and are a run away from two titles

4. A dynasty minimum requirement is 3 in 4 years… The chiefs are not a dynasty

5. Ain't no way chiefs over 49ers just no way

6. The Chiefs should not be ahead of the 49ers, Cowboys, or Patriots. Those dynasties never lost in a Super Bowl let alone get blown out in one.

7. The chiefs are not ahead of the 80s Niners. I know Nick has to get his Chiefs bias in but let’s be realistic 2 of the 49ers teams went 14-2 or better including 2 blowout wins over the dolphins and broncos including beating the broncos by the biggest margin in Super Bowl history. The chiefs and 49ers dynasties aren’t the same let alone the chiefs being ahead of the 49ers

8. Patriots dynasty was 2001-2018 buddy

9. Nick Bayless (chiefs version)

10. Mini dynasties arnt actually dynasty. You need 3 or more. Nothing less

11. How do you not include Patriots from 2015-2019? Made 4 superbowls over 5 years and won 3

12. Nick. Chiefs don't get to be on the same tier as the Pats man.

13. Nick is an idiot!!! You know nothing!!

14. Nick simultaneously saying the Eagles and 49ers weren't very good but also putting the Chiefs top 3 dynasty. If the teams they beat were bad, then how are they good? Oh. We call that inverse logic. Dumba** Nick.

15. The Cruyff Netherlands are more famous non champions

16. Can someone explain why the Pats aren't being considered one Dynasty but are instead being broken up into 2 different runs?