One less option in the draft. What are people's thoughts on this? One less opportunity for us? Or we unaffected by this?

8 comments

  1. I wanted to say with our front offices draft history we need as many good options as we can get. But we dont even have a front office

  2. I liked him to fill our need at 2 guard with Wagler off the board and thought a reach at 9 could have even been justified on paper.

    It somewhat makes sense for him as 2027 class looks like dogshit so if he shows a consistent stroke he could be a top pick.

    If he puts up another ass regular season he loses the recency bias of the tourney run and his HS rankings which could set his perception way back.

    I’m also going to reach and say this is a knock because his biggest upside was he appeared to have that dawg in him and coming back when he probably would’ve been late lotto shows that might not be the case.

    I think the bigger narrative is we will see this a lot more with the coming draft classes looking weak. I was hoping to take Flory with the NOP 2nd but he is going back too for example.

  4. Dude will be making more money at UConn while actually playing meaningful minutes vs sitting on a NBA bench.

    Mullins will be a lottery pick in the 2027 draft class, Chris Cenac, Jr, and Koe Peat are two others who should return both could be high lottery picks in 2027.

  6. Good move for him, he was not nba ready. Needs to add to his game and put a season of good shooting in, instead of just in theory being a good shooter

  7. Mullins is an example of players that make one or two shots in the ncaa tournament and get a reputation as a gamer. But he’s barely over 40% shooting, average 3pt shooting, slow and bad defender. Not a good pick. If he had been in an average team, he wouldn’t get drafted

  8. lmao, next we’re gonna have high school recruiting news in this bulls subreddit

Comments are closed.